We walk through how DeFi turns selling into a choice by making it simple to borrow against crypto assets for real-world goals. Tobias Van Amstel, co-founder and CEO of Altitude, explains trust signals, sustainable yield sources, and why building financial-grade software requires a safety-first mindset.
• What’s broken in asset-backed lending
• Borrowing versus selling and the psychology of money
• A simple mortgage-style model for crypto loans
• Transparency, audits, and accountable teams as trust pillars
• First-time borrower hurdles and UX simplification
• Sustainable yield: borrower interest, trading fees, RWAs, incentives
• Reliability standards for financial software
• AI agents thriving on transparent, programmable finance
• Keeping DeFi open to both funds and small savers
Looking for the structured conversation and key takeaways for CMOs and AI marketing leaders? Read the cleaned and structured reference version here:
DeFi Lending Explained: Borrowing Against Crypto Instead of Selling
How DeFi Makes Asset-Backed Loans Work For Everyone – with Tobias van Amstel
Asset-backed borrowing has long been a blind spot in traditional finance. Banks will readily advance credit against your future salary, yet make it difficult to borrow against assets you already own, aside from a narrow mortgage exception. DeFi flips that script by letting both large funds and everyday savers borrow or lend on the same rails. That shared access changes incentives and behavior. Selling becomes optional. If you bought Bitcoin at a low price and it appreciates, you can borrow against it, unlock liquidity for real-life needs, and keep exposure to future upside. This isn’t abstract speculation; it’s a practical bridge between digital wealth and off-chain goals like housing, land, or education.
To understand this shift, think like a homeowner refinancing. Suppose your house is worth a million and your outstanding mortgage is half a million. A bank might let you draw to 80 percent, giving you fresh capital. If you invest that capital at a higher rate than your borrowing cost, you generate a spread that can reduce your original debt. DeFi applies a similar logic to crypto collateral, but with programmable, transparent rules on-chain. You post BTC or ETH, borrow stablecoins at a defined loan-to-value ratio, and choose a venue with fair rates. Instead of selling your principal asset, you keep it working while sourcing liquidity. The mental model helps non-native users grasp why borrowing against crypto can be sensible and less emotionally fraught than timing exits.
Trust, however, remains the make-or-break factor. Three signals matter most: transparency, code security, and accountable teams. A trustworthy protocol clearly discloses collateral rules, sources of yield, and where assets reside. It has audited contracts, a track record free of exploits, and a team that stands behind the product. For newcomers, the path is still steep: wallets, self-custody, gas fees, on-ramps and off-ramps, and the learning curve of collateralized loans. Smart product design can ease this journey. Loan optimizers that route borrowers to the best rates, integrated wallets, and seamless fiat bridges reduce cognitive load so users can focus on outcomes rather than mechanics.
Yield clarity is equally vital. Today’s DeFi returns tend to come from four buckets: borrower-paid interest to lenders, trading fees to liquidity providers, real-world asset yields ported on-chain, and protocol incentives. Each carries distinct risks, liquidity profiles, and sustainability. Incentives can be alluring but volatile; token prices often compress after launch, shrinking the headline return. Durable strategies weigh stable, transparent sources, blending borrower yield, trading revenue, and RWA flows. The goal is simple: know exactly what you are earning and why, and ensure that the reward matches risk tolerance. Liquidity, pricing transparency, and audited pipelines are key to separating signal from noise.

Joeri Billast and Tobias van Amstel in Sintra, Portugal
Building this infrastructure demands a higher engineering bar than typical consumer apps. In marketplace software, a bug frustrates a user; in DeFi, a bug can destroy savings. That reality forces disciplined development: rigorous testing, multiple audits, conservative release cycles, and relentless monitoring. The mindset mirrors aviation or medical software, where reliability is paramount and “move fast and break things” is not a virtue. Product velocity must coexist with formal verification, incident playbooks, and principled security upgrades.
Looking forward, AI agents will accelerate the value of public, programmable finance. Traditional systems hide data behind portals and restrict action behind credentials. Blockchains invert this: market data, account structures, and contract logic are open by default, and agents can act via scoped keys and guardrails. With the right limits—separate wallets, spending caps, policy checks—agents can rebalance, borrow, repay, or seek best execution autonomously. This transparency-action loop is why DeFi is fertile ground for useful automation that respects user intent. If the industry can preserve open access—where a billion-dollar fund and a saver with a hundred dollars share the same opportunities—then DeFi will have met its promise: a level playing field where capital efficiency, not gatekeeping, defines who gets to participate.

Tobias van Amstel, co-founder and CEO of Altitude
Chapter Markers
- 0:00 Setting The Stage: DeFi And Access;
- 0:26 Meet Tobias And Today’s Focus;
- 0:53 What’s Broken In Traditional Lending;
- 2:07 From Speculation To Real-World Use;
- 2:43 Psychology Of Borrowing Versus Selling;
- 4:09 A Simple Mortgage-Like Mental Model;
- 6:09 Trust Signals: Transparency And Security;
- 7:51 First-Time Borrowers’ Friction Points;
- 9:04 Finding Sustainable Yield In DeFi;
- 10:19 Building Financial-Grade Software;
- 12:07 AI Agents, Transparency, And Action;
- 13:38 Keeping DeFi Open And Democratic;
- 17:55 Resources, Links, And Closing CTA






